Guess Who's Coming to Diner

The first annual arab global forum is coming to DC on Dec. 7&8.
What's on the menu: US technology, fighting common misperceptions, and closing eductation gaps...please allow me to translate:

stealing infidel trade secrets, taqqiya, and importing muslims to further colonize.

http://arabglobalforum.com/

Muslim Honor

Here is a dozen made dirty by muslim honor. Try to behold this travisity as cultural sensativity, if you can, I hope it drags you to hell. This is my only exception on immigration, we need to rescue the women and children from this dark world, leave the men for the company of their fellow jackals.

Barbarians at the Gates

The light cannot reach those who relish the dark corners of the soul.
The judeau christian west is superior than the barbarous muslims, and we must never equivocate, nor apologize, nor allow them into the city gates.
Click on the link for the images.

http://blogs.tampabay.com/photo/2009/11/terrorism-thats-personal.html

Terrorism that's personal (12 images)EDITOR'S NOTE: GRAPHIC CONTENT

Text by Jim Verhulst, Times' Perspective editor | Photos by Emilio Morenatti, Associated Press

We typically think of terrorism as a political act.

But sometimes it’s very personal. It wasn’t a government or a guerrilla insurgency that threw acid on this woman’s face in Pakistan. It was a young man whom she had rejected for marriage. As the United States ponders what to do in Afghanistan — and for that matter, in Pakistan — it is wise to understand both the political and the personal, that the very ignorance and illiteracy and misogyny that create the climate for these acid attacks can and does bleed over into the political realm. Nicholas Kristof, the New York Times op-ed columnist who traveled to Pakistan last year to write about acid attacks, put it this way in an essay at the time: “I’ve been investigating such acid attacks, which are commonly used to terrorize and subjugate women and girls in a swath of Asia from Afghanistan through Cambodia (men are almost never attacked with acid). Because women usually don’t matter in this part of the world, their attackers are rarely prosecuted and acid sales are usually not controlled. It’s a kind of terrorism that becomes accepted as part of the background noise in the region. ...

“Bangladesh has imposed controls on acid sales to curb such attacks, but otherwise it is fairly easy in Asia to walk into a shop and buy sulfuric or hydrochloric acid suitable for destroying a human face. Acid attacks and wife burnings are common in parts of Asia because the victims are the most voiceless in these societies: They are poor and female. The first step is simply for the world to take note, to give voice to these women.” Since 1994, a Pakistani activist who founded the Progressive Women’s Association (www.pwaisbd.org) to help such women “has documented 7,800 cases of women who were deliberately burned, scalded or subjected to acid attacks, just in the Islamabad area. In only 2 percent of those cases was anyone convicted.”

The geopolitical question is already hard enough: Should the United States commit more troops to Afghanistan and for what specific purpose? As American policymakers mull the options, here is a frame of reference that puts the tough choices in even starker relief: Are acid attacks a sign of just how little the United States can do to solve intractable problems there — therefore, we should pull out? Or having declared war on terrorism, must the United States stay out of moral duty, to try to protect women such as these — and the schoolgirls whom the Taliban in Afghanistan sprayed with acid simply for going to class — who have suffered a very personal terrorist attack? We offer a reading file of two smart essays that come to differing conclusions.

• In August, Perspective published a New York Times Magazine piece that followed up the story of Afghan sisters Shamsia and Atifa Husseini, who were attacked with acid simply for attending school. If you wish to refresh your memory, you may read the original article here.

• Two very smart, informed observers come to opposite conclusions on the proper U.S. course of action in Afghanistan. Here are excerpts from arguments that each of them has recently made:

Here are excerpts from Steve Coll’s “Think Tank” blog at NewYorker.com, in which he argues why we can’t leave — “What If We Fail In Afghanistan?” (Read it in full here.)

In an essay entitled “The War We Can’t Win” in Commonweal (also reprinted this month by Harper’s), Andrew J. Bacevich makes the case that we are overstating the importance of Afghanistan to U.S. interests. Bacevich is a professor of international relations at Boston University and the author, most recently, of The Limits of Power. A retired Army lieutenant colonel, he served from 1969 to 1992, in Vietnam and the first Persian Gulf War. He was a conservative critic of the Iraq war. Several of his essays have run before in Perspective. To read this one in full, go here.

• See the Sunday November 22, 2009 Perspective section in the St. Petersburg Times But be forewarned: Those photos are even harder to look at than this one.

Christian Warrior Anthem

I am going to do something special with this.




Lyrics:
The transliterated lyrics to "Preliator," which is Latin for "Warrior" or "Fighter," read as follows. For simplicity's sake, I have deleted the first version of the lyrics, which are flat-out inaccurate. My thanks to Kendralogan, who laid down the framework for this answer, and for beginning the translation. As the lyrics to this song were written by someone who only knew basic Latin, I have taken some creative license and expanded them slightly so that they make more sense in English. They are as follows:

Our savior, blessed God, You are eternal
Your mystery, your holy death, before all

Our blessed Savior,
You number the hairs on our heads;
Truly blessed, blessed are we
We, the warriors of truth

Our savior, blessed God
We fight for your holy cause
Beyond eternity, enduring always
Are you, the leader of the choir, Regal King of the universe

For you Savior, we defend the holy cause
Bright Father, gloried in resurrection!
For you Savior, we defend the holy cause
Bright Father, gloried upon that day

The earth is shadowed, an evil place
Those who are wicked shall perish,
Who do not take what our Master has put forth
The Bright Father, Regal King of the universe

For you Savior, we defend the holy cause.
Bright Father, gloried in resurrection!
For you Savior, we defend the holy cause.
Bright Father, gloried upon that day!

For you Savior, we defend the holy cause
Bright Father, gloried in resurrection!
For you Savior, we defend the holy cause
Bright Father, gloried upon that day!

Tearful, tearful are those
Who do not take what our Master has put forth

Hasan's Lecture

Unlike the other famous last lecture, which was full of good advice, here's Hasan's lecture to other military officers. Good job you cabbage head generals for instilling such an emphasis on "diversity" that your solider's are afraid to act on red flags like this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/gallery/2009/11/10/GA2009111000920.html

MOTUS

Let me know which you like better:
MOTUS Muslim of the United States or
COTUS Caliph of the United States

Ft. Hood: Jihad Job

Ft. Hood is a jihadi attack.
Multiple attackers targeting troops deploying to muslim countries=Jihad
This is the only reason FBI has gone to Ft. Hood.
What remains to be seen is how many more supported. Who was their imam? Was he a military chaplin? What about the families.

Expect CAIR to issue the Islamaphoia warning any time now.
Media will play along or minimize, much like they did with the beltway sniper John Allen Mohammed.

More to follow.

CAIR Calls RFDAH Out

Well its official, CAIR knows who I am. RFDAH got mentioned in
this CAIR press release for being in their banquet.
I'll take this as a badge of honor, I think CAIR intends it as a warning.
Either way, they cared enough to go digging.


http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS247776+28-Oct-2009+PRN20091028
WASHINGTON, Oct. 28 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) today distributed an editorial, entitled "Islamophobia
Machine Targets American Muslims," outlining what the Washington-based Muslim
civil rights group says is a campaign by "extremists of all stripes who
coordinate and cooperate in a relentless effort to demonize Islam and deprive
American Muslims of their civil rights."

CAIR distributed the editorial through ISLAM-OPED, a syndication service
designed to offer an American Muslim perspective on current political, social
and religious issues. ISLAM-OPED commentaries are offered free-of-charge to
one media outlet in each market area. Permission for publication will be
granted on a first-come-first-served basis. (Contact: CAIR National
Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-488-8787, 202-744-7726,
ihooper@cair.com)

---

CAIR: Islamophobia Machine Targets American Muslims
Nihad Awad
WORD COUNT: 1187

[Nihad Awad is national executive director for the Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR), the nation's leading Muslim civil liberties organization. He
may be contacted at nawad@cair.com.]

"Are you a believer?" asked the participant in a Capitol Hill gathering of
Islamophobes and Muslim-bashers who -- according to conference materials --
were seeking to promote "freedom of speech and religion."

When CAIR's intern answered, "Yes, of course," the conference participant --
whose card indicated he works for "Encountering Islam Christian Ministry" and
obviously thinking "believer" meant something other than Muslim -- replied,
"Good, because we want to cut their [Muslims'] necks off."

Just one hour later, the officially-registered intern was asked to leave the
conference, which was held in the U.S. Congressional Auditorium, because "some
of the panel members do not feel comfortable with you being here." So much for
freedom of speech and religion.

Before being ejected, CAIR's intern heard one audience member seek advice from
a panelist as to how American Muslim rights could be "curtailed," given the
fact that "unfortunately" Islam itself cannot be outlawed.

But not to worry -- one of the speakers at the Washington, D.C., conference
does advocate outlawing Islam in America. That speaker, David Yerushalmi,
works for one of the other speakers at the conference, Frank Gaffney Jr.

Other panelists included anti-Islam hate blogger Pam Geller, who has appeared
at Muslim-bashing events with Gaffney and with another conference speaker,
Florida House of Representatives Majority Leader Adam Hasner. Hasner recently
hosted an appearance by extremist anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert "ban the
Quran" Wilders in Florida, which was co-hosted by the hate blogger and
promoted by another conference panelist, Tom Trento of the Florida Security
Council.

Does all this make sense? It does if you understand that there is an
"Islamophobia Machine" made up of extremists of all stripes who coordinate and
cooperate in a relentless effort to demonize Islam and deprive American
Muslims of their civil rights.

The list of attendees at CAIR's recent sold-out 15th annual banquet in
Arlington, Va., further illustrates how the Islamophobia machine works.

Two of those who purchased tickets for the banquet were notorious Islamophobes
with histories of Muslim-bashing and associations with hate groups.

Among the 750 Muslim community members and activists, interfaith leaders and
diplomats from Muslim-majority nations who heard addresses by speakers such as
Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rabbi Steven B. Jacobs of Progressive Faith Foundation
were the two "moles" -- a hijab-clad representative of an anti-Islam group and
a "counterterrorism consultant" who claims Thomas Jefferson only owned a Quran
"so that he could know his enemy, so he could confront them, know them, kill
them."

The consultant, John Cosgrove, made that claim weeks earlier as he protested
the "Day of Islamic Unity," during which thousands of American Muslims
gathered for prayer on Capitol Hill. Cosgrove is head of the Virginia chapter
of the anti-Muslim hate group called the United American Committee (UAC). He
was one of the main opponents of the expansion of an Islamic school in
Virginia.

In 2007, the head of the UAC called Islam a "cult" and said terrorists are
"honest" Muslims. He also stated that anyone who believes Muslims are not the
"enemy" is "incredibly ignorant or a simple-minded fool."

SEE: GOP Women's Group Promotes Anti-Muslim Hate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnLAsDOknU8

Hijab-wearing mole number two, Christine Brim, is senior vice president for
policy and program management at the Center for Security Policy. She was asked
to leave the event after being observed surreptitiously recording the banquet
speeches, despite earlier being given legal notice that such recordings were
prohibited. Instead of speaking to security personnel, Brim immediately fled
to the hotel's exit. (CAIR's dinner was an open event with media present.
Unauthorized recordings are prohibited only to prevent abuse by those who
have, in the past, sought to smear the speakers by distorting their words.)

Brim, along with Cosgrove, was an opponent of the Islamic school in Virginia.

Her group and its President Frank Gaffney Jr. actively promote the racist and
anti-Islam ideology of David Yerushalmi, the center's general counsel, who has
advocated outlawing the practice of Islam in America and permanently closing
all U.S. mosques.

SEE: Center for Security Policy Staff
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/staff.xml

In a 2007 commentary headlined "War Manifesto -- The War Against Islam,"
Yerushalmi called for a "war against Islam and all Muslim faithful." He wrote
in part:

"On the so-called Global War on Terrorism, GWOT, we have been quite clear
along with a few other resolute souls. This should be a WAR AGAINST ISLAM and
all Muslim faithful...At a practical level, this means that Shari'a and
Islamic law are immediately outlawed. Any Moslem in America who adopts
historical and traditional Shari'a will be subject to deportation. Mosques
which adhere to Islamic law will be shut down permanently. No self-described
or practicing Muslim, irrespective of his or her declarations to the contrary,
will be allowed to immigrate to this country..."

Another such "manifesto" called for making "adherence to Islam" punishable by
a 20-year prison term.

In a 2006 article for The American Spectator, Yerushalmi wrote: "Muslim
civilization is at war with Judeo-Christian civilization...The Muslim peoples,
those committed to Islam as we know it today, are our enemies."

In another article, Yerushalmi wrote: "Instead of a promise of victory, Sura
24:52 must be made ashes in the mouths of Muslims. A seemingly unending air
control campaign over enemy territory is the way to continually remind the
Muslims of their subordinate status and the impotence of Allah without
becoming mired in the quagmire of counterinsurgency."

He also wrote that he "has staked out an approach which is to Know the Enemy
by declaring the enemy historical, traditional, and authoritative Islam."

Yerushalmi's website once contained the following white supremacist language
as part of its mission statement:

"America was the handiwork of faithful Christians, mostly men, and almost
entirely white, who ventured from Europe to create a nation in their image of
a country existing as free men under G-d."

Other articles on his website made racist statements such as: "There is a
reason the founding fathers did not give women or black slaves the right to
vote," and "Race matters and affects your intelligence. Jews are the smartest
white people around. Orientals smarter than Whites. Latinos next. Then
Blacks."

Another article stated:

"Is there something unique about the Black American (or, at least the Black
New Yorker) that leads him to murder so disproportionately and to most often
kill and victimize his own?"

Yerushalmi is also the former employer of Dave Gaubatz, his one-time "Director
of Intelligence and Counter-terrorism Studies" and author of a Muslim-bashing
book. In 2007, Yerushalmi's group paid Gaubatz $148,898 for "research."

Gaubatz has a long history of bigotry targeting Islam and Muslims. He has
called Islam an "evil ideology" and a "terminal disease." Along with his past
rhetorical attacks Islam, Gaubatz has called President Obama a "crack head"
and wrote that "a vote for Hussein Obama is a vote for Sharia Law."

It is becoming obvious to anyone who puts all the parts of the Islamophobia
machine together that American Muslims are being targeted by a coordinated and
well-funded nationwide effort to disenfranchise their community and demonize
their faith.

This insidious effort will only succeed if Americans of all faiths fail take a
stand against un-American attempts to divide our nation along religious lines.


---

CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization.
Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue,
protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that
promote justice and mutual understanding.


CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-488-8787 or
202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com; CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina
Rubin, 202-488-8787 or 202-341-4171, E-Mail: arubin@cair.com




SOURCE Council on American-Islamic Relations

Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR National Communications Director, +1-202-488-8787, +1-
202-744-7726, ihooper@cair.com, Amina Rubin, or CAIR Communications
Coordinator, +1-202-488-8787, +1-202-341-4171, arubin@cair.com

--
Radio Free Dar al Harb: Every time you listen, a Jihadi cries.

Bring the Pain at:
blogtalkradio.com/radiofreedaralharb
radiofreedaralharb.blogspot.com

CAIR 15th Annual Banquet Quicklook

CAIR had its 15th annual banquet this past Saturday, Oct. 24, 2009, at the Gateway Crystal City Marriott in Arlington, VA. Located a few blocks from the Pentagon, it is ironic that their venue was the same used to host Arlington County's 9-11 After Action Conference, where first responders and officials from around the country came to learn from Arlington County's repose to 9-11.

All credit to my unnamed supporter, the theme of this year's banquet was the incredible shrinking CAIR. Embassies that attended in the past did not have tables, and though the Saudi Embassy had a table, only two people who may, or may not, have been from the Embassy arrived. Otherwise, it was 6 open seats at the table. Also notably absent were the Jordanian Embassy and the Iranian Interests Section. In doing a comparison between past banquets, far fewer embassies attended this year. However, while its old friends sat out, a new friend, in the form of Libya arrived. The Embassy of Libya had a full table as the Libyan Ambassador to the US attended the event. The Libyan Ambassador received special recognition by MC Mahdi Bray, and a very warm personal greeting from Esam Omeish. Perhaps this video contributed to Omeish's loss in his Dem. Va. Delegate primary loss:



CAIRs gave most of its awards its immediate inner circle. This raises the question of whether or not CAIR could find anyone of note that would actually accept the award. Mahdi Bray received one of their awards, perhaps for good work such as this:


This years banquet had more, and more visible, security. Marriott, Wachenhut, and CAIR staff put on a strong show. Of interest, the CAIR staff acting as security had badges this year, however I could not identify what the big gold shields said. If the shields had police, or special police, on them, they would have been in violation of Virginia law. It could not be determined if the increase in security was due to our video from last year, security required for Jesse Jackson, and or both.



The other big questions is why were Jesse Jackson, and sidekick Rabbi Steve Jacobs, their? Solicitations for the Rainbow Coalition PUSH were made, and as Bray said in pushing for donations for Jackson, "you've got to be a friend, to get a friend." Was Jackson there because CAIR paid for his help in response to the Myrick et al crackdown? Was Jackson just piling on to stay relevant?

Though I never agree with what they say, the speakers this year were worse than last year. Amidst a series of rambling, conspiracy theory, defensive, and half-hearted saber rattling, Larry Shaw stood out as the standout gaffe maker. Larry Shaw made a joke about the FBI sponsoring tables that was not well received due to the tangible paranoia in the room. He then proceeded to make an incoherent diatribe implying the US government was ignoring drug cartels to focus on low level drug dealers. Perhaps the most telling audience participation of the night was when Shaw asked the crowd separately if there were any U.S. military and then first responders in attendance. No one raised a hand or uttered a word. Dead silence.

Robert Spencer received a direct challenge from Mahdi Bray and Muslim Mafia was the target of the bully pulpit for the speakers. A victory in the Flying Imams case was also celebrated.

CAIR's donations that night, approximately $170,000+ helped them meet their quarterly goal of raising $1 million, alleged Bray after a substantially abbreviated fund raising effort by Siraj Wahhaj.

Funniest moment of the night goes not to a speaker, but to the Tiramisu that had alcohol in it. Only the Kafir in attendance recognized that wonderful haram taste.

I am working on scanning copies of the material that handed out at the tables near reception.

I sat with Martin McMahon (CAIR and Saudi lawyer), Arab News reporter Sarah Ferguson, and an Alhurrah anchor and producer. Always strange company at these events.

Obama Negotiates with Wildfire

Obama To Enter Diplomatic Talks With Raging Wildfire

Pro NAMBLA School Czar

So, who hasn't violated the law, professional ethics, and moral standards now again?
So you told a 15 year old student it was ok to have gay sex with older men in a bus station....hmmmm, you're perfect for a White House position, how about safe school Czar?



And here he is railing against educational institutions pushing heterosexuality on kids, how dare they....I am next waiting for his "pro test tube-manufactured baby" speech or the "save the planet, kill the humans" ramblings.

FloridaFlorida Department of Law Enforcement earns an F

Great article. Bottomline: CAIR has no place in Law Enforcement investigations...ever ever ever ever ever ever ever.

Florida Department of Law Enforcement earns an F

Center for Security Policy | Sep 16, 2009
By John D. Guandolo
[Note: John D. Guandolo is a 12 ½ year veteran of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. At the request of the Center for Security Policy, he prepared an assessment of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s (FDLE) investigation of the Ohio-based parents of former Muslim Rifqa Bary, the 17-year old apostate from Islam who has sought refuge in the state of Florida. The FDLE report is provided here, and is available as searchable text for the first time, below his analysis. The significant errors and omissions that Mr. Guandolo and other experts have found in this FDLE investigation show a failure in FDLE’s professional responsibility in handling the Rifqa Bary case. Governor Crist and FDLE management need to get new investigators on the job, start over, and this time do it right. A life may be at stake due to FDLE negligence-- and willful blindness-- in conducting this investigation.]


John D. Guandolo:
Response to FDLE Investigative Report on Rifqa Bary Matter

Upon my review of the report filed by the FDLE regarding the Rifqa Bary Matter in Florida, I offer my professional opinion.

1. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Investigative Summary OR-73-1741 encapsulates the investigation into allegations made by Fathima Rifqa Bary (hereafter referred to as "Rifqa Bary") that she is or may be in physical danger from her father, Mohamed Bary, or others. Point 4 on page 2 of the report states Rifqa Bary believes her life to be in danger from an "honor killing" by her family or others, which she states is in accordance with Islamic Law. The report finds: "Ms. Bary's concern that she may be killed because of her conversion from Islam to Christianity remains a subjective and speculative concern..." and concludes there is no conspiracy to commit violence against her. The investigators in this matter offer this opinion void of any knowable facts.

In fact, a due diligence review would reveal the existence of authoritative Islamic Law texts officially translated into English. This review would further reveal Islamic Law - which is real law - has requirements and rules as to how to deal with those who leave Islam [eg The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, "Umdat al-Salik" also known as "Reliance of the Traveller" - publicly available]. If it can be shown (1) there is a requirement in Islamic Law for killing Ms. Bary as a publicly declared apostate from Islam, (2) that her parents adhere to Islamic Law, and (3) that she did, in fact, leave Islam and convert to Christianity, then the FDLE has a professional responsibility to include these facts in this report, and investigate this matter fully. There is nothing subjective about this - these are all ascertainable facts. I would hope the Florida State's Attorney's Office has done their due diligence on this matter and is aware of this

2. Mr. Bary's comments to the Investigators claiming there is "absolutely not" any concept of Honor Killings under Islamic Law can also be comparatively and factually reviewed against Islamic Law. There are, in fact, rules and requirements as to how apostates should be handled within the context of Islamic Law, and these facts must be reviewed by FDLE if a professional and factual report is to be completed.

3. It was noted that the Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) -Columbus (Ohio) and the Staff Attorney for CAIR were present during the interview of Mr. Bary by FDLE Investigators. Absent from the FDLE report was any mention that CAIR is a known Muslim Brotherhood entity and an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial - the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history - revealing HLF as a Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood front in the United States. All defendants in this case were found guilty in November 2008 and are serving long prison terms. These facts about CAIR were testified to at trial, and accepted as legally true. They are irrefutable - the documents demonstrating these facts were stipulated to by the defense. The Muslim Brotherhood's (MB) creed is "Allah is our goal; the Messenger is our guide: the Koran is our constitution; Jihad is our means; and martyrdom in the way of Allah is our inspiration," and their stated objective in America is a "Civilization-Jihad" to destroy the United States from within, and the MB exists to implement Islamic Law here in the United States.

All of these facts are relevant for two critical reasons. First, these material facts should be made known to the State Attorney's Office and any Judges involved in this case as a matter of course. Secondly, when representatives from an organization that is objectively known to be hostile towards to the United States and unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history, are allowed to be present during a law enforcement interview of someone, it raises questions as to why they were allowed to be present at the interview at all.

These facts further demand an objective look to determine if the Muslim Brotherhood itself has a position on Islamic Law and Apostasy. One of the MB's two stated objectives is to implement Islamic Law in North America (and across the globe), and it is known they call for adherence to Islamic Law wherever Muslim communities exist. The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law: Reliance of the Traveller is approved as valid Islamic Law by the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a known Muslim Brotherhood entity, as proven in the HLF trial.

In Reliance of the Traveller, Investigators will find specific legal doctrine on how apostates are to be treated under Islamic Law. Furthermore, the Muslim Brotherhood has a history of officially addressing the issue of Apostasy. In 1984, Ismail R. Al-Faruki , the Founder of IIIT, stated: "That is why Islamic Law has treated people who have converted out of Islam as political traitors...[Islam] must deal with the traitors when convicted after due process of law either with banishment, life imprisonment, or capital punishment...but once their conversion is proclaimed, they must be dealt with as traitors to the state."

Apostasy is also specifically addressed in Peace and the Limits of War, published by IIIT and written by Louay Safi, the former Executive Director of IIIT, Malaysia, the Association of Muslim Social Scientists (a proven Muslim Brotherhood entity), and the Executive Director of the Islamic Society of North America's (ISNA) Leadership Development Council. ISNA was proven to be a Muslim Brotherhood entity and is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history - HLF. The book is also approved by the Secretary General of ISNA. In it, Mr. Safi notes that individual apostates cannot be killed for a "quiet desertion of personal Islamic duties," but can be put to death as "just punishment" when the apostate deserts Islam publicly (p. 31).

4. This is a statement of facts regarding this matter:

* There are requirements in Islamic Law regarding someone who deserts Islam
* The Muslim Brotherhood's objective is the implementation of Islamic Law in the United States
* Rifqa Bary has left Islam and become a Christian
* Rifqa Bary has made statements to FDLE officials and others that her parents have threatened to kill her because she has left Islam
* The Bary's appear to be adherent to Islamic Law
* The Bary's appear at an interview with two Muslim Brotherhood representatives doing business as CAIR, a group known to be hostile towards the United States which is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history
* The Muslim Brotherhood supports the killing of Muslims who publicly leave Islam

5. It is my professional opinion that sufficient Probable Cause exists to believe that Ms Bary's concerns for her personal safety are based in a realistic and factual understanding of her situation, and, therefore, a further criminal investigation is warranted.



John D. Guandolo is a 12 ½ year veteran of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.



Florida_Department of Law Enforcement
Investigative Summary
OR-73-1741

Pursuant to a request for investigative assistance, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement conducted an investigation into allegations by juvenile female Fathima Rifqa Bary that she is or may be in physical danger from her father, Mohamed Bary or others. FDLE's authority regarding criminal investigations is dictated by Florida Statute 943, as follows:

943.04 Criminal Justice Investigations and Forensic Science Program; creation; investigative, forensic, and related authority.-

2)(a) ... the department may investigate violations of any of the criminal laws of the state, and shall have authority to bear arms, make arrests and apply for, serve and execute search warrants, arrest warrants, capias, and other process of the court. FDLE has conducted numerous interviews and inquiries as part of this investigation, and is documenting the substance of those interviews as part of the FDLE case file. This document will serve as an Investigative Summary regarding FDLE's findings in this matter.



INVESTIGATIVE FINDINGS

On August 24, 2009, FDLE conducted an interview of Fathima Rifqa Bary. At that time, she made the following allegations:

1. Ms. Bary alleged she was the victim of an Assault by her father during an incident when her father threatened to strike her with a laptop computer in June 2009.

The investigative efforts by FDLE did not identify an assault having occurred against Ms. Bary in the state of Florida. Investigation of this allegation indicated it occurred in the state of Ohio, for which FDLE has no jurisdiction. Checks with Ohio law enforcement agencies revealed no derogatory information on Mr. Bary based on this allegation.

2. Ms. Bary alleged she was the victim of an Aggravated Assault by her father during the above mentioned incident when she alleges her father said "I will kill you, tell me the truth".

The investigative efforts by FDLE did not identify an aggravated assault occurring against Ms. Bary in the state of Florida. Investigation of this allegation indicated it occurred in the state of Ohio, for which FDLE has no jurisdiction. Checks with

Ohio law enforcement agencies revealed no derogatory information on Mr. Bary based on this allegation.

3. Ms. Bary alleged she was the victim of long term child abuse by her father. Ms. Bary alleged her father struck her regularly and provided the following examples in support of her allegation: Ms. Bary advised she was struck in the face in the family car and she was struck in the face for interrupting a conversation.

The investigative efforts by FDLE did not identify any evidence of child abuse having occurred against Ms. Bary in the state of Florida. Investigation of this allegation indicated the incidents occurred outside the state of Florida, for which FDLE has no jurisdiction. Checks with other law enforcement agencies revealed no derogatory information on Mr. Bary based on this allegation.

Should Ohio determine an investigation into the above allegations in their jurisdiction is warranted, FDLE stands ready to assist the state of Ohio in any way possible.

4. Ms. Bary alleged she will become the victim of an "honor killing" by her family or unknown persons due to her conversion from Islam to Christianity.

This allegation by Ms. Bary is based on her belief or understanding of the Islamic faith and/or Islamic law and custom. Ms. Bary stated that she believes Islamic law dictates she must be put to death for her abandonment of the Islamic faith which she refers to as apostasy. Ms. Bary has not articulated who would commit such a killing, other than her father (as listed above in allegation two), or where it would occur. Other than her father, she does not identify any specific individual who have verbally or physically threatened her with death. No credible reports of threats toward Ms Bary have been received in the states of Florida or Ohio.

The Islamic community was not investigated. An investigation into any person, religious or social organization without a specific identifiable criminal predicate is inappropriate. Investigators checked with the local, state and federal law enforcement communities in the Columbus, Ohio and Orlando, Florida areas and have not been made aware of any identifiable threat to Ms. Bary or the Bary family regarding this allegation. At the time of this report, FDLE has received no information from law enforcement agencies of threats toward Ms. Bary or the Bary family, nor has FDLE developed any derogatory information on the Bary family. The FDLE cannot further evaluate the potential for a threat to Ms. Bary given the lack of specific information. FDLE has not been able to establish that a crime has occurred in the states of Florida or Ohio, or will occur in the states of Florida or Ohio in relation to the allegations by Ms. Bary. FDLE is mindful of the rights of all individuals associated with this investigation and has remained focused on specific allegations of criminal activity as presented by Ms. Bary. Ms. Bary's concern that she may be killed because of her conversion from Islam to Christianity remains a subjective and speculative concern in that FDLE's inquiry to date has failed to reveal any evidence ofa conspiracy to commit, solicitation to commit, attempt or other efforts to commit any such action or other violence against her.



The following is a summation of the investigative activities conducted by FDLE:

On Monday, August 24, 2009, Special Agents of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and a Child Protective Investigator of the State of Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) conducted a sworn taped interview with Fathima Rifqa Bary, a juvenile. During the interview, Ms. Bary admitted to having run away from her home in Westerville, Ohio on July 20, 2009 and to having travelled by Greyhound bus to Orlando, Florida. Ms. Bary stated that she ran away from home due to her fear that her recent conversion from the Islamic faith to Christianity would result in violence or death.

Ms. Bary stated that in approximately June 2009 she learned that a friend of her father had notified her father of Ms. Bary's Facebook page which had information about her religious conversion. She stated her father confronted her in her bedroom, grabbed the laptop computer from her and threatened her with it during a conversation about the issue. During the exchange of words, Ms. Bary alleged her father lifted the laptop computer and reared it back as if to strike her with it, saying "I will kill you, tell me the truth". Ms. Bary stated she thought her father would strike her with the computer, but he did not.

In an interview with FDLE on August 27, 2009, Mr. Bary denied having threatened his daughter. He stated that in June, when he confronted his daughter in her bedroom regarding Christianity, he grabbed the laptop computer she was working on. He stated that he lifted it to throw the computer and decided not to, that he had invested too much money in it to break it.

In an interview on August 28, 2009, Mr. Brian Williams, an associate ofMs. Bary's, told FDLE that he told Columbus police (CPD report #090609442) that Ms. Bary had told him about her father threatening her with the laptop computer and about her mother finding Christian materials in her room in July 2009. Williams told CPD that he knew Ms. Bary would reach a runaway point.

During continuation of the interview with Ms. Bary, she stated throughout her childhood and into adolescence she was the victim of physical abuse by her father. She stated that on one occasion during her childhood, her father struck her in the face when she was in the family car en route to Mosque. She stated that she was wearing the traditional Islamic Hijab, a headscarf worn by Muslim women, and that she slumped down in the car in order to not be seen by others. Ms. Bary stated that her father struck her in the face apparently for showing embarrassment of her Islamic religion and customs. She also stated that her father struck her in the face when she was a young child for having interrupted a conversation between her parents. Ms. Bary said the last time she was a victim of abuse was when she was in middle school.

On August 27,2009, Mr. Bary was interviewed by FDLE. When asked about corporal or other punishment Mr. Bary stated that his daughter seldom was punished and when necessary, a scolding or denial of privileges was the norm. He denied ever striking her.

On August 27, 2009, FDLE agents interviewed Mrs. Bary regarding corporal punishment of her daughter. Mrs. Bary advised that usually a stern scolding was all that was required to correct her daughter.

On August 27, 2009, Rilvan Bary, Ms. Bary's older brother, was interviewed by FDLE.

Rilvan Bary stated he knew of no corporal punishment toward Ms. Bary, and of no incidents ofphysical abuse by their parents.

On August 27, 2009, FDLE checked with New Albany Middle School, New Albany, Ohio, for records of abuse as outlined by Ms. Bary. Mr. Jeff Warner, Director of Communications for the Plain Local School District in New Albany, stated that the district had already conducted searches of their records due to public and press interest in the case, and had found no evidence of any reporting of abuse or suspected abuse. He stated that Ohio is a mandatory abuse reporting state, so any suspected abuse had to be reported by law.

In another incident, Ms. Bary stated that a high school teacher, Ms. Debbie Crump, had offered to house her in the event that she (Ms. Bary) needed to escape repercussions from her family due to her Christian religious beliefs.

On August 31, 2009, FDLE spoke with high school teacher Ms. Debbie Crump by telephone. Ms. Crump stated that she was not aware of any danger toward Ms. Bary regarding her conversion to Christianity. She said that she made an offer to Ms. Bary to stay at her residence because Rilvan Bary was having parties at the Bary residence when the parents were out of town. Alcohol was allegedly being consumed by Rilvan's guests and Ms. Crump was concerned for Ms. Bary's safety in that environment.

In continuation of her interview, Ms. Bary stated that she was in fear of being killed for her "apostasy" or conversion from the Islamic faith to Christianity, which she characterized as a violation punishable by death in Islam. She referred to the act as an "honor killing." She did not articulate who would carry out the killing, but suggested that her father, male blood relative or unknown individuals in the Islamic community would be required to commit the killing.

On August 27, 2009, Mr. Bary was asked if there was any Islamic punishment for conversion from Islam to Christianity. Mr. Bary answered "absolutely not" and "there is no such thing as honor killing." An attorney present at the time, Mr. Romin Iqbal, characterized the concept as cultural and tribal, not related directly to the Islamic religious practice.

Ms. Bary discussed her upbringing and stated that she had been a cheerleader at New Albany High School. When asked if her father approved of her cheerleading she stated that her father had no real idea what the concept or activities involved in cheerleading were, and allowed it. She stated that she always wore sweatpants or other coverings to hide the short skirt of the cheerleading outfit from him. She stated her father had never been to an event in which she performed as a cheerleader. Furthermore, she stated the family had no photos of her cheering or team photos as would appear in a yearbook.

On August 27, 2009, Mr. Bary stated to FDLE that he knew about his daughter's cheerleading activities. He said that she had asked her mother for permission to cheer and was denied. Ms. Bary then asked Mr. Bary for his approval and he subsequently allowed her participation.. Mr. Bary stated that he drove her to cheerleading practice occasionally during the week He said he had never seen her perform due to his work commitments.

On August 27, 2009, Rilvan Bary told FDLE that his parents seemed to be supportive of his sister's cheerleading activities.

When FDLE and other investigators visited the Bary household on August 27, 2009, several photos of Ms. Bary dressed in her cheerleading uniform were prominently displayed in the family living room.

Ms. Bary stated she had made her conversion to Christianity over a period of years, but in June 2009 was baptized in Ohio by Brian Williams, a 21 year old associate. She stated that several of her associates at the House of Prayer in Columbus knew of her concerns and fears of being killed for her apostasy to Islam.

On August 27, 2009, FDLE interviewed three people at the House of Prayer in Columbus Ohio. All knew of Ms. Bary and were familiar with her Facebook page which listed her concerns over leaving the Islamic faith. The interviewees stated they did not know Ms. Bary well and did not discuss her situation directly with her.

Ms. Bary was asked how she came to Orlando. She stated that she had hitchhiked from a neighbor's house to the Columbus, Ohio Greyhound bus station on July 20, 2009. She stated she had arranged for a ticket through Christian associates she had met on the Facebook social networking page. She stated she traveled to Orlando, was met by the Law family and eventually taken in by the Lorenz family.

On August 28, 2009, Mr. Williams confirmed that he had picked Ms. Bary up at the Hopson's residence on July 20, 2009 and drove her to the Columbus Greyhound station for her trip to Florida. He further stated that she had preplanned locations around the country, including a location in Georgia, Jacksonville, Florida and Orlando, Florida, with Orlando being her primary planned sanctuary. Mr. Williams referred to the preplanning locations as Ms. Bary's "fire drills ".

On August 31,2009, DCF investigators told FDLE that when they first spoke to Ms. Bary about travelling to Florida, she told them she had used money saved from her job to purchase the ticket. FDLE's investigation has revealed that the ticket was purchased in Orlando under a fictitious name and provided to Ms. Bary. During her interview, Ms. Bary acknowledged that it was her signature on the ticket. FDLE has maintained a copy of this ticket for this case file.

On August 27, 2009, FDLE and DCF conducted an investigation in the greater Columbus, Ohio area in an attempt to verify Ms. Bary's allegations of criminal activity.

FDLE/DCF Investigators were accompanied to the Bary residence by Sgt. John Hurst of the Columbus P.D. Child Abuse Squad. The residence is located in an apartment complex.

Mr. Babak Darvish, Executive Director of the Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Columbus and Mr. Romin Iqbal, Staff Attorney for CAIR OHIO were present.

Investigators interviewed Mr. Bary in a voluntary noncustodial setting. Mr. Bary was cooperative and asked to be able to tell his side of the story. Mr. Bary volunteered that he learned of his daughter's conversion to Christianity in early 2009. He stated that because she is still under age and living in his home he believed she should continue to study and practice Islam. However if she were to return from Florida, Ms. Bary would be allowed to study Christianity. Mr. Bary further stated that at the time she becomes an adult, she would be free to worship as she pleased. Mr. Bary denied having threatened his daughter. He stated that in June when he confronted his daughter in her bedroom regarding Christianity, he grabbed the laptop computer she was working on. He stated that he lifted it to throw the computer and decided not to as he had invested too much money in it to break it.

When asked about corporal or other punishment, Mr. Bary stated that his daughter seldom was punished and when necessary, a scolding or denial of privileges was the norm. He denied ever striking her.

Mr. and Mrs. Bary said that several years before, when Ms. Bary was in middle school, she wanted to babysit and created posters for advertisement. He stated that his daughter listed herself as a Christian and that Mr. and Mrs. Bary questioned her about the reference. He stated she never really answered the reference.

Mr. Bary stated that he knew about his daughter's cheerleading. He said that she had asked her mother for permission to cheer and was denied. Mr. Bary advised he ultimately gave her permission to participate. Mr. Bary stated that he drove Ms. Bary to cheerleading practice occasionally during the week. He advised he had never seen her perform due to his work commitments.

Mr. Bary stated that about a year ago, his son Rilvan told him that Ms. Bary was carrying a bible to school and that she was speaking with students about Christianity. Mr. Bary stated that he told Ms. Bary not to discuss religion in school as it was against the rules.

On August 27, 2009, FDLE agents interviewed Mrs. Bary in furtherance of this investigation. Mrs. Bary stated that her daughter had changed significantly in recent months, paying less attention to her younger brother and the family in favor of other activities including late night computer use and telephone calls on her cell phone. Mrs. Bary denied any knowledge of physical abuse of her daughter. Mrs. Bary stated that it was her husband's belief that their daughter should study and learn Islam first, but could study other religions also.

On August 27,2009, Rilvan Bary, Ms. Bary's older brother was interviewed by FDLE.

Rilvan Bary stated he knew of no corporal punishment toward Ms. Bary and of no incidents of physical abuse. He stated that his own situation within the residence was that he was a part-time resident who had gotten an apartment with friends but spent a lot of time at home. He knew of his sister's religious conversion through his friends at school.

He was asked by Ms. Bary to keep it quiet from her parents. He stated he noticed a change in her behavior and said that she had changed her group of friends to a much older group. Rilvan Bary stated that his circle of friends was predominantly American

Christians and that he had suffered no ill treatment for his associations. He admitted to being less than devout with his Muslim religious studies. Rilvan Bary stated his father did not force him to practice it although his father does pray five times daily. Rilvan Bary stated that his parents seemed to be supportive of his sister's cheerleading activities.

On August 28, 2009, Brian Williams contacted FDLE via telephone. Williams advised that he knew Ms. Bary and that he had baptized her in June 2009. Williams stated he had previously advised Columbus police (CPD report #090609442) that Ms. Bary had told him about her father threatening her with the laptop computer and about her mother finding the Christian materials in July 2009. Williams stated he told CPD that he knew Ms. Bary would reach a runaway point.

FDLE's investigation has not developed any information which supports an allegation of criminal activity in the state of Florida. Furthermore, our investigation has provided no clear evidence of criminal activity in other states which may be supportive of the above allegations. FDLE is prepared to assist the state of Ohio or any other entity in furtherance of investigative matters which may pertain to their areas of jurisdiction.

Epic Win

Epic Spider Win

Islam on Capitol Hill Day Videos

The Crazy Persian referenced in the video had the Iranian flag drapped around his neck and carried a yellow box with a variety of support Palestine/get rid of the Jews slogans. The purpose of the box was to solicit donations. So, every cop loves a crazy eyed guy with a big yellow mystery box roaming around the crowd...the US Capitol Police stopped the guy, searched him, then let him go, guess he wasn't a threat...no where have heard that before...

Muslims to America: We don't fear you

This post is dedicated to the media's coverage of the Muslim prayer day on Capitol Hill.
Analysis then videos.

First and foremost from the Washington Post:
"'We wanted to bring people out to show you don't need to fear America,' said Imam Ali Jaaber of Dar-ul-Islam mosque in Elizabeth N.J., the service's main organizer."Or more accurately: We wanted to bring people out to show Muslims don't fear America.

In the same article they feature the standard Muslims as victims quote: "Stop being so scared!" thundered Imam Abdul Malik of New York. "You ain't done nothing wrong. Just do the work of Allah, and believe." and the WP described it as a "pep rally for the beleaguered U.S. Muslim community."

Beleagured by who? what? when? how? and why? Good journalism, ney activism, ney propoganda there Jacqui Salmon

What's a good way to describe the opposition? Criticism, discourse, self-defense,...how about Crusaders attacking innocent Muslims:
The organizers of a Muslim day of prayer scheduled to take place Friday in front of the U.S. Capitol have come under attack from some conservative Christians.

Further, how about the WP feature Hassen Abdellah, defender of the Umma, would have you believe Muslims have never done anything and issues a challenge:
"I don't understand. This is a simple event. All we want to do is pray," he said. "In America, name one event where Christians tried to pray and Muslims disrupted it."
I'll garuntee there were a substantial number of Christians, Jews, and other faiths who had their prayers disrupted on 9-11.

Let's here it for common sense:
In a statement, the Rev. Canon Julian Dobbs, leader of the Convocation of Anglicans in North America's Church and Islam Project, warned that the service is "part of a well-defined strategy to Islamize American society and replace the Bible with the Koran, the cross with the Islamic crescent and the church bells with the Athan [the Muslim call to prayer]."

Christian evangelist Lou Engle said the Friday event "is much more than a nice little Muslim gathering. It's an invocation of spiritual powers of an ideology" that "doesn't have the same set of values that our nation has had."

Below, D.L Adams of Stop the Islamization of America gets in more clear thinking. It would have been nice if Channel 7 had been there for the whole SIOA event instead of showing up at the last minute, but any press is good press.



Additionally, accordingly a reporter who overuses the dictionary and under-utilizes research, John Cosgrove "brandished a book called The Quranic Concept of War to demonstrate the supposedly aggressive and confrontational nature of ancient and modern Islam."

Could Mr. Cosgrove have "shown" "displayed" or "held" a book? No, clearly, no, he brandished it. And all the victorious battles that the Sunnah and Hadiths describe, and the jihadi warporn videos? Are those aggressive or confrontational? Clearly not to James Rosen of FoxNews.com.

Rosen then goes on to put a great quote in from Mr. Cosgrove, except he omitted that Mr. Cosgrove directly challenges Congressman Keith Ellison by name. Additionally, the quote was probably seleted for no other reason then considered to be fanatical.

Noting the arguments of some that Thomas Jefferson possessed a copy of the Koran, Cosgrove conceded this was true and added: "He had it so that he could know his enemy, so he could confront them, know them, kill them, and vanquish the Islamic pirates, the scourge of the seas and spreading tyranny abroad. After reading the Koran, founding the Marines and expanding the Navy to go kill them, I think he laid the Koran down thinking perhaps he was done. Sadly, it was not the case."

Finally, if Mr. Rosen would rewind the video that FoxNews shot, he would see in fact that this is wrong: "John Cosgrove, who identified himself as a counterterrorism consultant..."
Mr. Cosgrove was neither introduced, nor introduced himself as such. Mr. Cosgrove introduced himself as the American Constitution and Capitalism Defense Front Virgina President. But hey, why let facts get in the way of opinionated news?

And now some videorama:

For Muslims a day of prayer on the west lawn of the US Capitol

Christian Broadcasting Network video and story here.

9-12 Rally Vids

I am still editing footage from the crowd, but I thought these videos will give you an idea of what it felt like. I am putting perhaps the most important video first. It is a call for Americans to make decisions as Americans, not as black/white/whatever Americans. As you have probably seen, playing the race card is an attempt to stifle free speech and debate on a very serious topic applying to all Americans. So note to those with "white guilt", get over it, our protected liberties and application of law and policy are guided by rule of law, not feelings.

"Don't Take It Anymore"


"To quote DMX: Preacher telling the truth and it hurts."


"Obama Street Theater"


"A Coal Miner's Speech"


"Dick Armey and Ray Charles"

9-12 Quicklook

About 1.5 million came out. Here's snap shot of what it looked like. If you weren't there, you missed out. Videos to come.

Moran Town Hall Fall Out

Aug. 25, 2009
South Lakes High School, Reston Va
8th Congressional District
Con. Moran invited Howard Dean to schelp for Obamacare, or as our sign correctly pointed out-national socialist healtcare.

Better video and reporting to follow, but wanted to get something out.

I didn't make the cut to get inside, so I hung around outside.

DNC sponsored astroturf:
Most of our signs are home made, no DNC astroturf signs for us, plenty of "Thank You" Obama for them. Bait and Switch alert: The DNC signs didn't say healthcare reform, health insurance reform. Subtle, but important, the ministry of propaganda has caught on that healtcare won't sell, but beating up on an insuracne bogeyman will.

Union Goons:
Union goons were in attendance. Local 10 Elevator Union.

Surpression of free speech:
As you'll see in a video below, we had sign with Obama as Joker, thank you DissentFromDayOne. We were told by a black Fairfax County School Security officer that we would have to keep the sign face down on the lawn or be thrown off for trespassing. So we took it directly to the a FXPD Captain and asked about the legality of this. Shame on us for not knowing the law, but now we know to do some research. The FXPD Captain didn't want to get in the middle of it, said there were different rules for schools. So, look for more events to take place at schools where the crowd can be more restricted in their free speech. Since no one could give us a straight answer, we applied the constitution and continued to hold the sign high for all the crowd to see. In related note: Con. Connolly hide behind elderly women to have his healthcare debate. Non retirement community residents were prohibited.

Overwhelming sporadic and unorganized opposition:
Outside, the crowd was a majority anti-socialist healthcare. However, when I asked these concerned citizens resiting government run econocare, none cited a particular organization that organized them, paid them to be there, told them what to say, how to act, and/or provided them protest material. Mostly self-mobilizing concerned citizens, expect for the LaRouche PAC people.

Racist:
Yes, we got the now obligatory racist. Yawn. It would be funny if it wasn't sad. You know you are winning the argument when the start calling you names.

Obamatons, Lemmings, and Useful Idiots:
Hard to distinguish, many O-no-care supporters shared all of these characteristics. Many would not engage in mono y mono debate. Those that did could not cite specific facts, just liberal talking points: Not having war would pay for it all, etc., I did have fun with the "its deficit neutral" argument. I reminded them that abstinence is "sex neutral." Neither one is realistic. In their closing statements they either ran away, insulted me, or a combo insult, declare victory, and retreat.

Here are the preliminary vids, more to follow.

A skirmish outside while the debate was going on inside:


Local 10 Elevator Union was there:


Democratic rift, interview with LaRouche PAC outside:


Call to action:


Mocking Dear Leader:


Closing Thoughts: